Case: XXX v. People of the Philippines
G.R. No.: E-00648
Date: July 29, 2026
Ponente: Hernando, J., First Division
Law: Section 5(i), Republic Act No. 9262
Nature: Petition for Review on Certiorari
Facts
XXX, a police officer, and AAA, a public-school teacher, were in a romantic and sexual relationship. After AAA became pregnant, their families agreed that they should marry.
The couple applied for a marriage license after XXX had previously failed to appear on the agreed date. On the day they successfully lodged the application, however, XXX retrieved the documents and informed the Local Civil Registrar that the marriage would no longer proceed. He did so without notifying AAA, despite knowing that she was pregnant and had already announced their intended marriage to her family and friends.
AAA suffered humiliation, sleeplessness, loss of appetite, restlessness, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation. A social-welfare officer and a psychometrician confirmed her psychological and emotional distress.
The RTC convicted XXX of psychological violence under Section 5(i) of RA 9262. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and awarded AAA moral and exemplary damages.
Issue
Whether XXX’s unilateral withdrawal of the marriage-license application constituted psychological violence under Section 5(i) of RA 9262, notwithstanding the rule that a breach of promise to marry is generally not actionable.
Ruling
Yes. The Supreme Court denied the petition and affirmed the conviction.
The Court held that XXX was not punished merely for breaking a promise to marry. He was held liable because his willful and arbitrary withdrawal of the marriage-license application—done after a public commitment, without notice, and with knowledge of AAA’s pregnancy—caused her serious mental and emotional suffering.
The prosecution established the elements of the offense:
- XXX and AAA had a dating and sexual relationship;
- XXX willfully withdrew the marriage-license application without notifying AAA after publicly committing to the marriage; and
- His conduct caused AAA mental and emotional anguish, as demonstrated by her testimony and corroborated by professional assessments.
The act went beyond ordinary heartbreak or incompatible expectations. It amounted to emotional manipulation and public humiliation falling within the statutory definition of psychological violence.
Doctrine
A breach of promise to marry, by itself, is not the offense punished under Section 5(i) of RA 9262. Liability arises when an accused willfully uses conduct connected with the contemplated marriage as a means of inflicting mental or emotional anguish upon a woman with whom he has a dating or sexual relationship.
RA 9262 focuses on the psychological effect of the offender’s willful conduct upon the victim, not merely on the formal nature of the act committed.
Disposition
The conviction was affirmed with modification. XXX was sentenced to:
- Imprisonment of two years, four months, and one day of prision correccional, as minimum, to nine years and four months of prision mayor, as maximum;
- A fine of ₱100,000;
- ₱75,000 in moral damages and ₱75,000 in exemplary damages, with 6% annual legal interest from finality until full payment; and
- Mandatory psychological counseling or psychiatric treatment.

































