The Author
The author is a practicing lawyer, who began this law blog in 2011.
LAW PRACTICE
The author took the bar in 2015 and passed the same. She went into private practice and taught as a university professor. She entered the public attorneys office in 2017.
Education
The author is a graduate of Bachelor of Arts in Mass Communication and Bachelor of Laws (conferred with Juris Doctor). She is an alumna of Holy Name University.
Leisure
The author loves to write, travel, and write about her travels.
BLOG
Visit her blog: hitchhikersguidetothephilippines.blogspot.com
Showing posts with label E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company. Show all posts
Showing posts with label E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 21, 2017
Case Digest: Ong Ai Gui vs. the Director of Patent Office, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
G.R. No. L-6235
March 28, 1955
ONG AI GUI alias TAN AI GUI, applicant-petitioner,
vs.the Director of the Philippines Patent Office, respondent.
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, intervenor.
FACTS:
Applicant-petitionerTan
Ai gui filed an application with the Director of Patents for the registration
of the following tradename: "20th Century Nylon Shirts Factory, which the
latter denied.
RULING:
The
Court upheld the Director of Patents reasoning that a word or a combination of
words, in this case “nylon” and “shirt factory”, which is merely descriptive of
an article of trade, or of its composition, characteristics, or qualities,
cannot be appropriated and protected as a trademark to the exclusion of its use
by others.
Furthermore, the use of the term "nylon" in the tradename
is both "descriptive" and "deceptively and misdescriptive"
of the applicant-appellant's business, for apparently he does not use nylon in
the manufacture of the articles he produces and sells. Not to mention, the word
“nylon” is a general term which is not distinctive and, thus, cannot be
afforded secondary meaning attributable petitioner’s business so as to permit
registration.
Applicant
petitioner was not entitled to the exclusive use of the terms












