The Author

The author is a practicing lawyer, who began this law blog in 2011.

LAW PRACTICE

The author took the bar in 2015 and passed the same. She went into private practice and taught as a university professor. She entered the public attorneys office in 2017.

Education

The author is a graduate of Bachelor of Arts in Mass Communication and Bachelor of Laws (conferred with Juris Doctor). She is an alumna of Holy Name University.

Leisure

The author loves to write, travel, and write about her travels.

BLOG

Visit her blog: hitchhikersguidetothephilippines.blogspot.com

Showing posts with label E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company. Show all posts
Showing posts with label E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Case Digest: Ong Ai Gui vs. the Director of Patent Office, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company

G.R. No. L-6235             March 28, 1955
ONG AI GUI alias TAN AI GUI, applicant-petitioner, 
vs.the Director of the Philippines Patent Office, respondent. 
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, intervenor.


FACTS:

Applicant-petitionerTan Ai gui filed an application with the Director of Patents for the registration of the following tradename: "20th Century Nylon Shirts Factory, which the latter denied.

RULING: 

The Court upheld the Director of Patents reasoning that a word or a combination of words, in this case “nylon” and “shirt factory”, which is merely descriptive of an article of trade, or of its composition, characteristics, or qualities, cannot be appropriated and protected as a trademark to the exclusion of its use by others. 

Furthermore, the use of the term "nylon" in the tradename is both "descriptive" and "deceptively and misdescriptive" of the applicant-appellant's business, for apparently he does not use nylon in the manufacture of the articles he produces and sells. Not to mention, the word “nylon” is a general term which is not distinctive and, thus, cannot be afforded secondary meaning attributable petitioner’s business so as to permit registration.


Applicant petitioner was not entitled to the exclusive use of the terms