The Author
The author is a practicing lawyer, who began this law blog in 2011.
LAW PRACTICE
The author took the bar in 2015 and passed the same. She went into private practice and taught as a university professor. She entered the public attorneys office in 2017.
Education
The author is a graduate of Bachelor of Arts in Mass Communication and Bachelor of Laws (conferred with Juris Doctor). She is an alumna of Holy Name University.
Leisure
The author loves to write, travel, and write about her travels.
BLOG
Visit her blog: hitchhikersguidetothephilippines.blogspot.com
Showing posts with label G.R. 93891 Pollution Adjudication board vs. Court of Appeal and Solar Textile Finishing Corp. March 11. Show all posts
Showing posts with label G.R. 93891 Pollution Adjudication board vs. Court of Appeal and Solar Textile Finishing Corp. March 11. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Case Digest: Pollution Adjudication board vs. Court of Appeal and Solar Textile Finishing Corp.
G.R.
93891
Pollution
Adjudication board vs. Court of Appeal and Solar Textile Finishing Corp.
March
11, 1991
Respondent
Solar assailed the Ex parte Cease and Desist Order by petitioner Pollution
Adjudication Board on the ground that the former was denied due process and
that the degree of threat required for the said Order is remiss. Petitioner
reasoned that under PD No.984 Section 7(a), the Board has the legal authority
to issue ex parte orders to suspend the operations of an establishment when
there is prima facie evidence that such establishment is discharging
effluents or wastewater, the pollution level of which exceeds the maximum
permissible standards set by the NPCC.
RULING:
The
Court ruled in favor of petitioner.
The
Court held that the Board may issue the ex parte cease and desist order upon
prima facie evidence that the respondent corporation has waste discharge beyond
the allowable standards set by the NPCC (Sec5, Effluent Regulations of 1982 and
Sec7(a),PD 984). If it has not yet been
subject to the allowable standard, the Board may still issue ex parte cease and
desist order upon prima facie evidence that the effluent pose an
"immediate threat to life, public health, safety or welfare, or to animal
or plant life. The court held that the Board, as the government entity tasked
to determine whether the effluents of a particular industrial establishment
comply with or violate applicable anti-pollution statutory and regulatory
provisions, has the authority to issue the order as it may see fit. This is,
after all, allowed by law to address relevant pollution issues as an immediate
recourse.












